U.S. Senate Allocates $527 Million for Counter-ISIS Operations in Syria and Iraq
By Kardo Roj
DAMASCUS, Syria (North Press) – The U.S. Senate has approved $527 million as part of the 2025 defense budget to bolster efforts against ISIS in Syria and Iraq. Of this, $147 million will support the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in northeast Syria, while $380 million is allocated to counter-ISIS operations in Iraq.
The decision underscores Washington’s continued commitment to combating ISIS, partnering with the SDF in Syria and Iraqi forces in their respective territories. The funds aim to enhance security, stabilize liberated areas, and prevent the resurgence of the extremist group, which has retained sleeper cells in both countries.
Troop Reduction in Syria
The approved budget includes a proposal to reduce the U.S. military presence in northeast Syria to 400 troops, a move likely to stir debate about the long-term efficacy of counter-ISIS operations. Currently, approximately 900 U.S. troops are stationed in Syria, primarily supporting the SDF in securing regions once under ISIS control.
Critics argue that a reduction in troop numbers may weaken efforts to combat ISIS remnants, while proponents highlight the need to minimize U.S. involvement in prolonged overseas engagements.
Extension of Caesar Act Sanctions
In a related decision, the Senate voted to extend the Caesar Act sanctions on Syria until August 2029. The sanctions, first enacted in 2020, target entities and individuals linked to the Syrian government, aiming to pressure Damascus into engaging in a political resolution to the country’s ongoing conflict.
The Caesar Act also restricts international financial transactions with the Syrian regime, exacerbating economic challenges in government-controlled areas. While the sanctions are intended to support accountability, they have faced criticism for their broader impact on Syria’s economy and civilian population.
Continued Threat of ISIS
Though significantly weakened, ISIS remains a persistent threat in Syria and Iraq. The group has adapted its tactics, shifting from territorial control to insurgent operations, including bombings, ambushes, and assassinations. In Iraq, rural and desert areas, particularly along the borders with Syria, continue to serve as hideouts for ISIS cells.
The SDF has been a key partner in the U.S.-led coalition’s efforts against ISIS in Syria. However, the group faces ongoing challenges, including periodic Turkish military operations in northeast Syria and limited international recognition.
In Iraq, U.S. support has been vital in rebuilding the capabilities of Iraqi security forces. However, political instability and the influence of Iran-backed militias complicate Baghdad’s efforts to maintain security and stability.
Debate Over U.S. Presence in Syria
The proposal to reduce U.S. troops in Syria reflects a broader shift in U.S. foreign policy, emphasizing a reduction in long-term military commitments. However, it raises concerns among counterterrorism experts who argue that a diminished presence could hinder efforts to counter ISIS resurgence and stabilize the region.
The U.S. troop presence in Syria also serves as a counterbalance to Russian and Iranian influence in the region. A reduction in numbers could embolden these actors, potentially destabilizing northeast Syria and undermining the gains made against ISIS.
Impact of Caesar Act Sanctions
The extension of Caesar Act sanctions signals Washington’s continued pressure on the Syrian regime. While the sanctions aim to curtail the Syrian government’s ability to finance military operations and suppress its population, they have also contributed to the country’s worsening economic crisis.
Syrians in government-controlled areas face soaring inflation, currency devaluation, and widespread poverty, leading to growing discontent. Critics of the sanctions argue that they disproportionately affect ordinary citizens, while proponents emphasize their importance in holding the regime accountable for war crimes and human rights violations.